We next worried about participants whose marriages had ended into the breakup otherwise splitting up (we
These types of efficiency improve questions about dealing with on-range locations (otherwise with the-range dating sites) just like the an excellent homogeneous package and then have emphasize the chance of solutions prejudice additionally the dependence on approaching it
I 2nd performed analyses of one’s market properties out of participants as a purpose of: (i) on-range appointment spots, (ii) on-line relationship-sites, and you can (iii) off-line meeting locations. Analyses showed that discover high variations in the advantages away from some one while the a function of the specific venue where it satisfied its partner across the into-range spots, on-range internet dating sites, and you will away from-range spots (Dining tables S2–S4). Such as for instance, respondents just who met their companion as a consequence of age-mail were avove the age of was asked according to the age of all of the respondents just who came across its spouse to the-line, while the fresh new respondents whom found the companion courtesy social networks and you can digital worlds was basically young.
e., marital break-ups) by the time of the survey. We performed a ? 2 test to investigate the extent to which the percentage of marriages ending in separation or divorce differed for individuals who met their spouse on-line vs. off-line. The percentage of marital break-ups was lower for respondents who met their spouse on-line (5.96%) than off-line [7.67%; ? 2 (1) = 9.95 
, P < 0.002]. 87, P < 0.05]. For marital break-ups, there was a significant interaction between meeting on-line vs. off-line and (i) year of marriage (P = 0.015), (ii) sex (P = 0.001), and (iii) ethnicity (P = 0.002). Those who were married relatively recently, males, and respondents of Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicity exhibited larger protective effects for meeting on-line (Appendix S2).